Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured overview that uses progressive disclosure effectively and provides concrete inline directives, but it lacks visible validation checkpoints for the destructive failover operations it governs, which caps workflow clarity. Some restatement in the constraint section could be tightened.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/verification checkpoint in the body for destructive operations (e.g., confirm routing-control state propagated to traffic before declaring failover complete, or verify zonal-shift status after enabling) so workflow clarity is not capped at 3.
Tighten the CRITICAL CONSTRAINT section by stating the two-capability scope once and referencing it, rather than restating the routing-control/zonal-shift framing multiple times and inlining the full redirect quote template.
Surface one or two key executable commands inline (e.g., the CLI to check a routing-control state or zonal-shift status) so the body is self-sufficient for the most common action without requiring a jump to the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows (no 'what is ARC/AZ' padding), but the CRITICAL CONSTRAINT section restates the two-capability framing several times and includes a full redirect quote template that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Inline guidance is concrete and specific — exact reference paths, the exact redirect wording to use, and precise MCP file-fetch syntax (file="references/arc-procedures.md") — with the detailed procedure appropriately delegated to the reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The body gives a clear gate-then-redirect-then-follow-procedure sequence with a strong scope guardrail, but it surfaces no validation/verification checkpoints for the destructive failover and zonal-shift operations; per the destructive-operations cap this cannot exceed 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references to arc-procedures.md and security-considerations.md (both present in references/), each described by what it contains; navigation is easy and content is appropriately split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |