Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured skill body: lean overview with appropriate delegation to a detailed, validated procedure, plus genuinely useful troubleshooting and security sections. The main improvement would be slightly more executable specificity in the troubleshooting section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | A lean ~45-line body with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section carries non-obvious signal such as the MCP-vs-local file guardrail and the 'three s's' policy-spelling note. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands appear in troubleshooting ('aws resiliencehubv2 list-failure-mode-assessments') and security (SSE-KMS, aws:SecureTransport, aws:SourceAccount), but the main setup steps are delegated to the reference and some troubleshooting guidance ('Verify input sources are correct') stays high-level. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The body directs the reader to 'follow the procedure exactly', and the referenced procedure sequences steps 1-10 with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: verify dependencies before any API call, poll until SUCCESS/FAILED, MUST NOT proceed until complete, and retry on the invoker-role error. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview pointing to a single, clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/setup-procedure.md, verified to exist with no nested references), keeping the SKILL.md itself minimal. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |