Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured router skill: the body stays lean, routes each task to a verified, one-level-deep reference file, and contributes genuine cross-cutting AWS decision knowledge in the routing notes. The only minor gaps are slight redundancy with the frontmatter description and the absence of any example commands in the body itself.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — routing notes carry non-obvious AWS specifics ("the only target that supports Large (5 Gbps) tunnels, equal-cost multi-path (ECMP) bandwidth aggregation, IPv6 customer gateways, and the VPN Concentrator") rather than generic IPsec education. Not a 5 because the Overview paragraph largely restates the frontmatter description and the "AWS side vs device side" bullet is mildly explanatory. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable routing: a goal-to-reference table ("Decide between static and dynamic (BGP) routing → choosing-static-or-dynamic-routing.md"), a tool directive ("Execute commands using the AWS MCP server when connected... Fall back to the AWS CLI otherwise"), and a specific flag rule ("pass --region {region} matching the VPC or transit gateway"). Not a 5 because the body contains no example commands — all executable detail is delegated to the reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is unambiguous for a router skill — "Read the matching reference in full before acting, then follow its constraints and steps" — with explicit ordering guidance ("Run the choosing-static-or-dynamic-routing reference before creating the connection so the customer does not have to recreate it"). Not a 5 because validation/checkpoint behavior lives entirely in the references rather than being signaled here. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Textbook router structure: a concise overview, a routing table mapping each goal to one of seven reference files (all seven paths verified to exist in references/), one level deep, and a statement that "The reference files are self-contained: each carries its own decision tables, constraints, procedure, and troubleshooting." Navigation is easy and nothing that belongs in a reference is inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |