Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, dense reference skill that trusts the reader and captures highly specific package behavior (key names, defaults, option precedence). Its weaknesses are the long inline API symbol list that belongs in a bundled reference file, an incomplete core code snippet, and the absence of an explicit verification loop for validating request mappings.
Suggestions
Move the 'Relevant API Surface' symbol list into a references/ file (or defer entirely to API.md) and link it explicitly, keeping SKILL.md as an overview (progressive_disclosure).
Add a short validate-then-run loop, e.g. confirm the provider request mapping with a no-key example before making a live call (workflow_clarity).
Make the Core Pattern snippet self-contained (imports and a runnable snippet drawn from examples/) so it is copy-paste ready (actionability).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence — it never explains what Go, audio, or providers are, and every section carries package-specific facts. It sits at anchor 4 rather than 5 because a few sentences (notably the long JSON-body Content-Type bullet) are convoluted run-ons that could be tightened, and the symbol list duplicates information available in the referenced API.md. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The Core Pattern gives near-executable Go code and the bullets supply exact key names, default models ("gpt-4o-mini-tts" with the "alloy" voice), and option names ("renderAudio" / "render_audio"). This matches anchor 4 (mostly executable, minor gaps) rather than 5 because the code snippet is incomplete (no imports or function context) and no full runnable example is inlined. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Guardrails sequence the approach: start from package examples, use no-key examples for deterministic local checks, and keep provider-api examples behind explicit credentials — a clear decision path with an implicit validation checkpoint. It misses anchor 5 because there is no explicit validate-and-retry loop (e.g., how to confirm a request mapping against a no-key run before touching live credentials). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized and Package Facts points to API.md, axir-api.json, and examples/, but no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/) exist in the skill, and the ~25-line 'Relevant API Surface' symbol list is inline content that duplicates the referenced API.md and belongs in a separate reference file. This matches anchor 3 (content that should be separate is inline) rather than 4, where references are clearly signaled and content is appropriately placed. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |