CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ax-rust-agent-rlm

Use when writing Rust code with `axllm` for RLM executor loops, AxCodeRuntime sessions, runtime envelopes, process runtimes, and optional runtime profiles.

68

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A lean, well-organized body with a concrete core code pattern, precise package facts, and clearly signaled one-level-deep pointers to package docs and examples. Its only gaps are undefined variables in the code snippet and the lack of an explicitly sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Every section is factual and lean ('Language: Rust.', 'Real network support: yes.') with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; the body assumes competence and every token earns its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

The Core Pattern gives real Rust syntax ('let helper = axllm::agent("question:string -> answer:string")?; let out = helper.forward(&llm, inputs, None)?;') and the API surface names are precise, but `llm` and `inputs` are undefined and no import/setup context is given, so it is not copy-paste ready.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Guardrails imply a sound approach ('Start from package examples for exact native syntax', 'Use `no-key` examples for deterministic local checks' — a verification checkpoint), but no explicitly sequenced steps are given for wiring a runtime end to end.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with well-organized sections; package materials ('API.md', 'axir-api.json', 'axir-capabilities.json', 'examples/') are clearly listed one level deep in Package Facts with no nested references.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A distinctive, trigger-rich description for a niche Rust package, with an explicit 'Use when' clause and a concrete list of target artifacts. It falls short of top marks only because the 'what' is folded into the 'when' clause and it leans on a single action verb.

Suggestions

State the 'what' as a distinct clause before the trigger, e.g., 'Provides API guidance, runnable examples, and guardrails for the generated Rust package `axllm`. Use when...'.

Vary the action verbs to enumerate what the skill does (e.g., 'wire', 'configure', 'debug') instead of a single 'writing ... for' construction.

Add natural synonyms the body shows users may ask about, such as 'AxCodeSession' or 'AxAgent'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('writing Rust code with `axllm`') and enumerates five concrete targets ('RLM executor loops, AxCodeRuntime sessions, runtime envelopes, process runtimes, and optional runtime profiles'), but relies on a single action verb rather than listing multiple distinct actions, so coverage has minor gaps rather than being comprehensive.

4 / 5

Completeness

The explicit 'Use when writing Rust code with `axllm` for...' clause concretely answers 'when', and the 'what' is conveyed by the same phrase, but the capability statement is never separated out, so 'what' is implicit rather than clearly explicit.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms for this niche ('Rust', 'axllm', 'AxCodeRuntime', 'runtime', 'runtime profiles') are present and a user of this package would say them, but a few natural variations the body itself uses (e.g., 'AxCodeSession', 'AxAgent') are missing from the description.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive niche terms ('axllm', 'RLM executor loops', 'AxCodeRuntime sessions') create a clear trigger signature with minimal overlap risk against generic Rust or general LLM skills.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
ax-llm/ax
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.