Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, fact-dense reference for the generated axllm audio API with strong specific detail (field names, defaults, error behavior) and useful guardrails. Its weaknesses are the absence of an executable example for the core audio tasks, only an implicit workflow sequence, and references to package materials (API.md, examples/) that cannot be verified and partially duplicated inline.
Suggestions
Add a short, complete Rust example of an audio task (e.g. building a speak() request via AxAIClient::speak and reading the result keys) to raise actionability from concrete-but-incomplete to executable.
Convert the guardrails and When To Use bullets into an explicit ordered sequence (consult examples -> map request fields -> run no-key check -> only then use provider-api with credentials) so the workflow has explicit checkpoints.
Move the inline Relevant API Surface symbol list into the referenced API.md (or a references/ file) so SKILL.md stays an overview and progressive disclosure is one level deep.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with package-specific facts (e.g. "`speak()` returns TypeScript's speech result keys: `data` (base64 audio), `format`, `mimeType`, `transcript`") with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; only the symbol dump in "Relevant API Surface" could be trimmed. It stops short of anchor 5 only because that inline list and some over-dense bullets could be tightened further. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete specifics are present ("OpenAI defaults to `gpt-4o-mini-tts` with the `alloy` voice", "AxAIClient::speak(request)"), but the only executable code is the 2-line Core Pattern (`let llm = ai("openai", options)?;`) with no example of speak() or audio input — the skill's core task. It exceeds anchor 3's pseudocode level but the missing executable example is more than a minor gap, so it does not reach anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | "Start from package examples for exact native syntax before inventing a new call shape" is a principle, not an ordered sequence; there are no explicit steps or checkpoints for accomplishing audio input/output tasks. No destructive or batch operations apply, so the cap is irrelevant, but the sequence remains implicit only — matching anchor 3's 'sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit'. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | "Package Facts" clearly signals external materials ("Package API docs: `API.md` and `axir-api.json`", "Runnable examples: `examples/`"), but no bundle files exist to verify those references, and the inline "Relevant API Surface" symbol list is content that belongs in the referenced API.md. Structure is decent yet content that should be separate is inline, matching anchor 3. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |