Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Well-structured and lean, but the body relies on a minimal code fragment plus external references rather than a complete executable example, and lacks an explicit validation step in its workflow. The inline API surface list and missing bundle files limit progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Replace the two-line Core Pattern fragment with a complete, copy-paste-ready example (including `options` definition and a basic call) so the body is executable without leaving SKILL.md.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint to the workflow, e.g. "run `cargo check` and verify behavior against a `no-key` example before finalizing."
Move the inline "Relevant API Surface" symbol list into the referenced `API.md` (and include `API.md`, `axir-api.json`, `axir-capabilities.json`, and `examples/` in the bundle) so SKILL.md stays a lean overview with one-level-deep references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, but the inline "Relevant API Surface" symbol list duplicates the referenced `API.md`, a minor instance of content that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The Core Pattern is only a two-line fragment (`let llm = ai("openai", options)?;` with `options` undefined) and the body defers to `examples/` for complete code, leaving key execution details missing. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Guardrails provide rough guidance but there is no sequenced workflow and no validation checkpoint (e.g., run `cargo check` or verify against `no-key` examples), leaving checkpoints implicit. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are clear and references to `API.md`, `axir-api.json`, and `examples/` are signaled, but the large inline API-surface list is content that belongs in a separate file, and the referenced files are not present in the bundle. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |