Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a tight, well-structured instruction-only skill: an exact runnable command, a precise argument specification, and explicit handling of both the argument-resolution failure and the dismissed-session case with no wasted tokens. The only notable gap is that the body never says concretely what to do when annotations are returned, leaving the core action implicit. A single sentence covering the happy path would bring it to full strength.
Suggestions
Add one line covering the happy path, e.g. 'When annotations are returned, read each one, apply the requested change to the target file or content, and briefly confirm what you did.'
Include a concrete example invocation (e.g. 'plannotator annotate src/config.yaml') so the command pattern is unambiguous for the common case.
Clarify how results are delivered back (inline edits vs. a follow-up plannotator command), if the tool expects one, so the 'address' step is fully executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean executable command plus three short paragraphs (argument spec, error recovery, dismissed-case handling) with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every token earns its place, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The command 'PLANNOTATOR_ORIGIN=mistral-vibe plannotator annotate $ARGUMENTS' is copy-paste ready, and both edge cases have concrete detection criteria ('output is empty, or a JSON object with "decision": "dismissed"'). It is not a 5 because the happy path — what concretely to do with returned annotations — is never instructed in the body, only implied by the title. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The flow is coherent with explicit conditional branches (re-run with a resolved target when arguments fail; stop and do not begin work when dismissed), which serve as clear checkpoints. It is not a 5 because the main path's steps for actually addressing annotations are absent from the body; there are no destructive or batch operations, so no cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, self-contained with no bundle files, and well organized into a command block and clearly separated condition paragraphs. Per the simple-skill guideline, this earns the top score without external file references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |