Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary process-orchestration skill: strictly sequenced phases, copy-paste-ready sub-agent prompts, explicit validation and recovery loops for batch operations, and conditional offloading of fallback details to a real, well-structured reference file. The only notable improvements are trimming the design-language duplication with the template asset and slimming the inline HTML spec.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and instructional with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but minor trims are possible: the Design Language section restates palette/typography/layout already available in assets/report-template.html, and a few meta-commentary lines ("This is the most time-intensive phase") add little. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready extraction and reduction prompts, exact commands (plannotator data-dir, platform-specific stat invocations), exact output paths (/tmp/compound-planning/extraction-{batch-name}.md), versioned filenames, dataset-size batching thresholds, and a fully specified hook file path and format cover the common cases concretely. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 0-6 are strictly sequenced with explicit validation and feedback loops for the batch extraction: "Verify the total matches the inventory from Phase 1. If any agent's count is short, flag it and consider re-launching", timeout re-launch instructions, user confirmation gates for incremental vs. full runs, and a Key Rules checklist for the report. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Fallback-mode details are properly offloaded to a clearly signaled, conditionally-read reference (references/claude-code-fallback.md), the parser script and design template are split out at point of use, and references are one level deep — but the ~590-line body inlines a large HTML design specification that stricter organization could partially move to the assets layer. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |