Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable commands and a clear workflow, well-organized into focused sections. Fixing the duplicate step numbering and adding an explicit validation feedback loop for destructive sandbox modes would push it higher.
Suggestions
Fix the duplicate step numbering in 'Running a Task' (two steps are both labeled '3'), which harms workflow clarity.
Add an explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop for destructive/batch sandbox modes (workspace-write, danger-full-access) to satisfy the destructive-ops validation cap.
Trim minor padding such as 'state-of-the-art software engineering' to improve token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient tables and numbered commands, with minor trimmable padding ('state-of-the-art software engineering') and a duplicated step numbering (two step '3's); not quite lean enough for a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands and a quick-reference table covering the common cases (read-only, workspace-write, danger-full-access, resume). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequence with checkpoints (non-zero exit handling, permission prompts for high-impact flags), but destructive modes lack an explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop and the step numbering bug slightly harms clarity. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the single SKILL.md is well-organized into clear sections of appropriate length, satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |