Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, well-structured, and gives actionable tool signatures plus a clear workflow with a capture checklist. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: it points to a bundled skill-references/ directory that does not exist and names no concrete files.
Suggestions
Either provide the bundled skill-references/ files or remove the reference and inline the essential note/task structure guidance.
When referencing bundles, name specific files (e.g. "See references/capture-quality.md") rather than only a directory.
Add one concrete example invocation of bm_recall and bm_capture with realistic arguments.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~33-line body is efficiently sectioned and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; minor redundancy in re-stating the "don't assume MCP tool names" point across Transport notes and References keeps it just short of fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete tool signatures (bm_recall({ query? }), bm_capture({ title? })) and a specific capture checklist, but offers no example invocations with real arguments and the referenced bundle does not exist, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence (recall, treat as reference, capture at decision/blocker/handoff, record durable state) with a capture-quality checklist; no validation/feedback loop, but the operations are not destructive or batch so the simple-skill exception applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized, but the References section signals only a directory ("bundled under skill-references/") with no specific file paths, and that directory is absent from the bundle, so references are present but not clearly signaled and effectively broken. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |