Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, well-structured, actionable workflow that respects token budget and delegates appropriately. The main gap is the absence of a worked example note and an explicit write/persist command, which would make the guidance fully copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it gives exact config paths, exact field values, and a one-line distinction ('a decision is a choice with rationale and consequences, not a casual preference') with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance is present throughout — exact paths (~/.codex/basic-memory.json), exact fields (type: decision, status: open, decided: <ISO timestamp>), and precise placement rules — but there is no example note body and no exact write command, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step numbered sequence ends with a confirmation step ('Confirm with the permalink') that acts as a checkpoint, and the supersedes/link handling provides a feedback path; this is not a destructive or batch operation so no cap applies, though there is no explicit validation that the write persisted beyond the permalink check. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a single-purpose skill well under 50 lines with no need for external reference files, the body is cleanly organized into an intro plus a numbered Steps section with sub-bullets, and it cleanly delegates detail to the bm-writing skill rather than nesting references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |