Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-sequenced for a simple instruction skill, with clear fields and a confirmation step. Its main gap is actionability: the actual note-persistence mechanism is delegated to the bm-writing skill rather than shown inline.
Suggestions
Add a one-line example of the Basic Memory write command or a minimal decision-note skeleton so the core action is executable without jumping to bm-writing.
Specify the exact note filename/path convention alongside the placement rules so the write target is unambiguous.
Show a short example of the supersedes linking syntax to make step 5 copy-applicable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and instruction-dense with no generic concept padding; the single scope-disambiguating line ("A decision is a choice with rationale and consequences, not a casual preference") is short and load-bearing rather than fluff. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete config-resolution logic and explicit note fields/sections are given, but the actual Basic Memory write mechanism is absent and delegated entirely to the bm-writing skill, leaving key details incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with a final permalink confirmation and supersedes-handling step; this is not a destructive/batch operation, so no strict validation gate is required. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple under-50-line skill with well-organized sections and no need for external bundle references, meeting the simple-skills allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |