Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a compact, well-structured single-purpose skill with a copy-paste template and a clear two-branch VitePress workflow. Its main gap is workflow clarity: it lacks an explicit validation/fix feedback loop for the build step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — short bullet '핵심' list, a compact copy-paste markdown template, and minimal prose — matching 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed' (e.g. the decorative emoji headers and the trailing '끝.' line); not a 5 only because of those few ornamental tokens. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a concrete, copy-paste markdown template plus specific commands ('pnpm install && pnpm dev', 'pnpm build') and a concrete file path convention, matching 'mostly executable guidance with minor gaps'; not a 5 because the '핵심 코드 (필요시만)' block is a placeholder rather than a runnable example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | It sequences a two-branch workflow (first run vs. subsequent run) with numbered steps and one verification cue ('pnpm build로 빌드 확인만'), matching 'steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints present but implicit'; not a 4 because there is no explicit validate-and-fix feedback loop or failure-handling step. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a single-purpose, under-50-line document with no bundle files and well-organized section headers (핵심 / 문서 내용 / VitePress 처리 / 중요), so the simple-skill exception applies: well-organized sections alone warrant a 5; there are no nested references to penalize. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |