workthrough

Automatically document all development work and code modifications in a structured workthrough format. Use this skill after completing any development task, bug fix, feature implementation, or code refactoring to create comprehensive documentation.

Quality

51%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

Pending

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Risky

Do not use without reviewing

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/workthrough/SKILL.md

Quality

Discovery

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This description has good completeness with clear 'what' and 'when' clauses, making it easy for Claude to know when to apply it. However, it lacks specific concrete actions and could be more distinctive to avoid conflicts with other documentation-related skills. The trigger terms are adequate but could include more natural user phrasings.

Suggestions

Add more specific concrete actions like 'generates structured walkthroughs, captures decision rationale, documents code changes with before/after context'

Include more natural trigger terms users might say: 'document my changes', 'write up what I did', 'create a dev log', 'workthrough'

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (development documentation) and mentions some actions ('document development work', 'code modifications'), but lacks specific concrete actions like 'generate changelog entries', 'create commit summaries', or 'produce technical writeups'.	2 / 3
Completeness	Clearly answers both what ('document all development work and code modifications in a structured workthrough format') and when ('after completing any development task, bug fix, feature implementation, or code refactoring') with explicit trigger guidance.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes relevant terms like 'development task', 'bug fix', 'feature implementation', 'code refactoring', but misses common variations users might say like 'write docs', 'document my changes', 'create a writeup', or 'log my work'.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The 'structured workthrough format' provides some distinctiveness, but 'documentation' is broad and could overlap with API documentation, README generation, or general technical writing skills.	2 / 3
	Total	9 / 12 Passed

Implementation

35%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill is well-intentioned but suffers from significant verbosity, explaining concepts Claude already understands (markdown formatting, why documentation matters, what good documentation looks like). The template structure is useful but buried in explanatory text. The skill would benefit from being condensed to just the template, naming conventions, and trigger conditions.

Suggestions

Remove explanatory sections like 'Quality Standards', 'Integration with Workflow', and the final motivational line - Claude understands documentation value

Extract the example template to a separate TEMPLATE.md file and reference it, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview

Add concrete automation: provide actual commands or scripts to gather git diff, collect build output, and auto-populate the template

Add a validation checklist with specific items to verify (e.g., '[ ] All modified files listed', '[ ] Build output included', '[ ] Exit code documented') rather than vague 'verify completeness'

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Extremely verbose with extensive explanation of concepts Claude already knows (what documentation is, why it's useful, basic markdown formatting). The skill could be reduced to 1/3 its length while preserving all actionable content.	1 / 3
Actionability	Provides a clear template structure and naming conventions, but lacks executable commands or scripts. The 'Automation Instructions' section describes what to do abstractly rather than providing concrete implementation (e.g., no actual script to gather modified files).	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Steps are listed in the 'Automation Instructions' section but lack validation checkpoints. No feedback loop for verifying the documentation is complete or correct before finalizing. The 'Verify Completeness' step is vague rather than actionable.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Content is organized with headers but everything is inline in one large file. The example template structure is helpful but could be extracted to a separate template file. No references to external files for detailed examples or templates.	2 / 3
	Total	7 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: bear2u/my-skills
Commit: 1be5394

Reviewed: 18 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.