Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable playbook with a clear sequenced workflow and validation checkpoints; the only minor gap is progressive-disclosure organization, where some edge-case guidance could be separated to streamline the primary flow.
Suggestions
Consider moving the 'Narrow-feature note' and 'Blocking direction' edge-case guidance into a short reference block or details section so the core 5-step flow reads cleanly for the common multi-layer case.
Add a one-line acceptance criterion to the issue template reminding the author that AFK issues should be mergeable without human review, to reinforce the HITL/AFK distinction at creation time.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense throughout: no explanation of what a PRD or tracer bullet is, just actionable repo-specific conventions (issues/NNN layout, lane splits, blocking direction) that Claude would not already know. Every section earns its tokens. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance—exact filenames, a copy-ready issue template, explicit do-nots ('Do NOT use gh issue create'), a quiz checklist, and concrete 2-issue shape patterns with named examples—covers the common cases directly. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps with an explicit feedback loop ('Iterate until approved') and a checkpoint for batch file creation (create in dependency order so Blocked-by references resolve to real filenames), plus an AFK fallback branch. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into numbered process steps with a clearly signaled inline issue template; no external references are needed, though the dense narrow-feature and blocking-direction guidance is inlined where a short reference could keep the main flow tighter. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |