Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill that is concise, actionable, and clearly structured. It provides a complete workflow from safety check through interview to output, with a concrete template that defines the expected deliverable. The instruction to skip unnecessary steps and the explicit guard against overwriting existing files show thoughtful design for real-world usage.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section earns its place. No unnecessary explanations of what a PRD is or how markdown works. The template is essential reference material, not padding. Instructions are terse and assume Claude's competence (e.g., 'Skip steps you judge unnecessary'). | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete, step-by-step process with a complete PRD template including section headers, formatting conventions, and an example user story. The output path (`issues/prd.md`) is explicit, and the safety check in step 0 is specific and actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly numbered and sequenced with a logical flow: check existing → gather input → explore repo → interview → design modules → write PRD. Step 0 includes an explicit validation/safety checkpoint (don't overwrite existing PRD) with clear recovery options. The 'Next' section provides pipeline continuity. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is appropriately self-contained for its scope. The PRD template is inline (correctly, since it's the core deliverable), and the 'Next' section cleanly points to the next pipeline step (`prd-to-issues`) without deep nesting. No bundle files are needed for this interview-driven skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |