Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean instruction skill with a clear multi-step workflow, explicit validation checkpoints, and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure into a real reference bundle. Minor gaps are a duplicate step number and specifics deferred to reference files rather than inlined.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what the AI Act is or how law works — with only minor phrasings that could be trimmed; not every token is maximally earned but there is no padding. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable guidance — exact reference file paths, 'cite an exact file and line', 'ten fields and exact status vocabulary' — but delegates the actual field list and vocabulary to reference files, leaving minor gaps for inline execution. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced workflow (Boundaries → Load references → Establish basis → Verify law → Review evidence → Write result → Final self-check) with explicit validation checkpoints and a self-check checklist; a duplicate step number ('5' appears twice in 'Verify the law first') is a minor clarity gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview that points to five real, one-level-deep reference files (official-sources.md, review-rules.md, output-contract.md, article-50-content-labelling.md, coverage-dates-and-penalties.md), each signaled by when to read it; navigation is easy and content is appropriately split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |