Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured, actionable guideline-authoring skill with concrete tokens, an explicit output structure, a sequenced workflow, and testable quality gates. Its main gap is the absence of a concrete worked example demonstrating the expected authored-guideline output.
Suggestions
Add one fully worked example of an authored component guideline (anatomy, states, tokens, a do/don't pair) to demonstrate the expected output format.
Show an example pairing a do-rule with a concrete don't-example, since the skill instructs this but does not model it.
Tighten minor redundancy (the 'Brand' paragraph restates the frontmatter description) and compress the weights list (e.g. '100–900') to further improve token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and bullet-driven with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows; each section (tokens, states, output structure, quality gates) earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete copy-paste-ready tokens (hex colors, type/spacing scales), enumerated required states, and an explicit output structure are provided, but there is no worked example of an authored guideline showing the expected output format, matching 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details' rather than the 'specific examples; copy-paste ready' anchor at 3. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step numbered authoring workflow is sequenced with a QA-checklist final step and testable Quality Gates serving as explicit validation checkpoints, matching the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; checklists for complex processes' anchor; this is authoring guidance, not a destructive/batch operation, so the strict feedback-loop cap does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so the single self-contained SKILL.md is evaluated on organization; it has clear, well-signaled sections and no nested references, matching the simple-skills note that well-organized sections score 3 when external references are unnecessary. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |