Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a concise, well-structured design-system guideline with a clear sequenced authoring workflow and quality gates, assuming Claude's competence throughout. Its main gap is actionability: concrete defaults and structure are present, but no executable component examples (markup, token CSS, code snippets) are provided.
Suggestions
Add at least one concrete, copy-paste-ready example (e.g., a sample component anatomy with token usage in CSS/JSX) to push actionability to level 3.
Include a small concrete anti-pattern example pairing a do-rule with its don't-example, since the 'Example Constraint Language' section currently only describes the pattern abstractly.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean, well-organized spec of tokens, rules, and workflow steps that assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining basic design concepts; every section earns its place without padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, specific guidance (token values, state lists, required output structure), but as an instruction-only design-system skill it stops short of fully executable/copy-paste-ready artifacts like component markup or token CSS; the guidance is actionable but not concrete enough for level 3. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Guideline Authoring Workflow' gives a clear, explicitly sequenced six-step process ending in a QA checklist, and the 'Expected Behavior' and 'Quality Gates' sections provide concrete checkpoints and prioritization rules for error/conflict resolution. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | As a self-contained skill under ~80 lines with no bundle files, content is organized into clearly labeled sections (Foundations, Rules, Workflow, Output Structure, QA) with no nested references, satisfying the simple-skill allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |