Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, concrete instruction set with a clear authoring workflow and terminal QA validation, weakened mainly by cross-section redundancy and the absence of a worked example illustrating the expected output.
Suggestions
Add one fully worked example of a finished component guideline (anatomy, states, tokens, accessibility acceptance criteria) so the Required Output Structure is shown, not just described.
Consolidate the overlapping accessibility/concreteness guidance currently spread across Expected Behavior, Quality Gates, and Example Constraint Language into a single section to reduce redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean and free of beginner-concept padding, but guidance is restated across overlapping sections (Expected Behavior, Quality Gates, Example Constraint Language, and Rules Do/Don't all revisit accessibility priority and concreteness), so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It supplies concrete specifics (exact type scale 12/14/16/20/24/32, hex color tokens, 8pt spacing, the required-state list, a 7-part output structure) but never demonstrates them in a worked example, so the guidance is actionable yet incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step Guideline Authoring Workflow is a clear sequence ending in an executable QA checklist, complemented by the Quality Gates acceptance criteria that function as explicit validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single self-contained file (~80 lines) is organized into clearly headed sections with no nested or broken references; it is compact enough to live inline, so well-organized sections satisfy progressive disclosure without external files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |