Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally tight, self-contained instruction skill: a numbered protocol with explicit failure handling, copy-paste-ready citation formats and phrasings, and strong prompt-injection and evidence-handling rules with zero padding. Nothing material is missing or misplaced.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense throughout: no concept explanations, no filler; every line is instruction or concrete decision criteria ('An answer worth keeping is one that took real work to assemble, that you would not want to re-derive...'). Assumes Claude's competence — anchor 5, not 4, since no section contains trimming candidates. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable instruction-only guidance: exact citation formats ('(wiki/concepts/x.md)', '(raw/<file>)', '<repo>@<sha>:<path>:<line>'), a copy-paste utterance ('/kb-ingest last-answer'), a page naming pattern (wiki/questions/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md), and concrete commands ('Read ./CLAUDE.md, then wiki/index.md', 'Grep wiki/'). Anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A 7-step sequenced Protocol with explicit error-recovery checkpoints at every fragile point: 'If either is missing, report that', 'If the revision is unavailable, report the gap', 'If two pages disagree, show both with citations', plus the step-6 gap statement. The skill is read-only so the destructive/batch cap does not apply; validation coverage is complete, matching anchor 5 rather than 4. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained ~52-line file with well-organized sections (overview, Protocol, Rules); no bundle files exist and none are needed, so per the rubric's simple-skill guideline well-organized sections alone warrant anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |