Crypto market rankings and leaderboards. Query trending tokens, top searched tokens, Binance Alpha tokens, tokenized stocks, social hype sentiment ranks, smart money inflow token rankings, top meme token rankings from Pulse launchpad, and top trader PnL leaderboards. Use this skill when users ask about token rankings, market trends, social buzz, meme rankings, breakout meme tokens, or top traders.
72
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly defines its scope around crypto market rankings and leaderboards. It lists numerous specific capabilities, includes natural trigger terms users would use, and has an explicit 'Use this skill when...' clause. The domain-specific terminology like 'Binance Alpha', 'Pulse launchpad', and 'smart money inflow' make it highly distinctive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: query trending tokens, top searched tokens, Binance Alpha tokens, tokenized stocks, social hype sentiment ranks, smart money inflow rankings, top meme token rankings from Pulse launchpad, and top trader PnL leaderboards. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (crypto market rankings across multiple dimensions like trending tokens, social sentiment, smart money, meme tokens, trader leaderboards) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use this skill when...' clause listing specific trigger scenarios. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'token rankings', 'market trends', 'social buzz', 'meme rankings', 'breakout meme tokens', 'top traders', 'trending tokens', 'smart money', 'Binance Alpha'. These cover a wide range of natural user queries in the crypto domain. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Occupies a clear niche focused specifically on crypto market rankings and leaderboards, with distinct triggers like 'Binance Alpha tokens', 'Pulse launchpad', 'smart money inflow', and 'PnL leaderboards' that are unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured API reference skill with excellent actionability — every endpoint has complete curl examples, parameter tables, and response field documentation. Its main weakness is length: the monolithic format with exhaustive field-level documentation for 5 APIs consumes significant tokens that could be better managed through progressive disclosure into separate reference files. Minor redundancy exists between the overview, use cases, and individual API sections.
Suggestions
Extract detailed response field tables for each API into separate reference files (e.g., SOCIAL_HYPE_FIELDS.md, TOKEN_RANK_FIELDS.md) and link from the main SKILL.md to reduce token footprint.
Remove or consolidate the 'Use Cases' section since it largely duplicates the Overview table and the rankType descriptions in API 2.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is mostly efficient with well-structured tables, but includes some redundancy — the 'Use Cases' section largely duplicates information already conveyed in the Overview table and the API sections themselves. The 'Supported Chains' table is repeated implicitly across each API's parameter descriptions. Some field documentation is exhaustive where Claude could infer types. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Every API includes a complete, copy-paste-ready curl example with correct headers, URLs, and request bodies. Request parameters, response fields, and sort/filter options are fully documented with types and descriptions. This is highly executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is essentially a reference skill for independent API calls rather than a multi-step destructive workflow. Each API is clearly documented as a standalone operation with unambiguous method, URL, parameters, and response structure. No destructive or batch operations require validation checkpoints, so the clear single-action documentation is sufficient. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is a single monolithic file with extensive field-level documentation for 5 APIs, resulting in a very long document. The response field tables for each API could be split into separate reference files to reduce the main skill's token footprint. There are no bundle files or external references to offload detail, and the document would benefit from separating the detailed field schemas. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
68fcfa1
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.