Content
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A solid, actionable skill with concrete CLI commands and useful interpretation rules for signal fields. The main weaknesses are minor verbosity in the overview/intent sections and the lack of error-handling or validation guidance. The progressive disclosure structure is reasonable but cannot be fully verified without the referenced bundle file.
Suggestions
Remove or condense the Overview bullet list and the single-row 'When to Use' table — the Commands table already communicates the same information more efficiently.
Add brief error-handling guidance: what to expect when the API returns no signals, rate-limits, or invalid chainId values.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient but has some unnecessary padding — the 'Overview' section restates what the commands table already conveys, and the bullet list of capabilities ('Get smart money buy/sell signals', 'Compare signal trigger price...') is redundant given the rest of the document. The 'When to Use This Skill' table with a single row adds little. However, the Rules section is dense and useful. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable CLI commands with concrete JSON arguments, specifies exact chainId values, documents optional args with defaults and caps, and gives clear field interpretation rules (status enum, exitRate meaning, URL prefix construction, timestamp format). Copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is essentially a single-command skill, so multi-step workflow is minimal. However, the Rules section provides good guidance on interpreting results (status filtering, quality indicators). There's no explicit validation or error-handling guidance — e.g., what to do if the API returns empty results or errors — which would be useful for a data-retrieval skill. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References `references/cli.md` for detailed per-subcommand docs, which is good one-level-deep disclosure. However, no bundle files were provided to verify the reference exists or is well-structured, and the main SKILL.md includes some content (like the full Rules section) that could arguably live in the reference file, making the split slightly unbalanced. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |