arxiv-mcp-server

Use when finding, comparing, reading, or monitoring arXiv papers, including requests for abstracts, citation graphs, original LaTeX, section-level technical details, or literature reviews.

Quality

93%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Quality

Content

93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, highly actionable skill body with concrete MCP tool names and commands plus a clear sequenced workflow. The only gap is the absence of explicit validation checkpoints in the retrieval workflow.

Suggestions

Add an explicit checkpoint between download and read (e.g., confirm the paper cached locally before paging through read_paper) to strengthen workflow clarity.

Note expected error behavior when a tool call fails or a paper has no LaTeX source, so Claude knows how to recover.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Lean body that names tools and commands directly with no concept padding; every line earns its place and assumes Claude's competence.	5 / 5
Actionability	Provides concrete MCP tool names (get_abstract, list_paper_latex_sections, download_paper, read_paper, citation_graph), executable commands (uvx arxiv-mcp-server, the [pdf] fallback), and explicit parameters (max_results, start, max_chars) covering the common cases.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clearly sequenced six-step workflow with ordering rationale (assess abstracts before downloading, list sections before fetching), but it lacks explicit validation/error-checkpoints between steps.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	A sub-50-line single-purpose skill with no external bundle files, organized into well-signaled sections (Recommended workflow, Runtime); per the simple-skills note this satisfies progressive disclosure fully.	5 / 5
	Total	19 / 20 Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, well-targeted description that pairs an explicit 'Use when' trigger with a comprehensive list of concrete arXiv capabilities. Only minor room for improvement via added synonyms like 'preprints' or 'arxiv.org'.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete capabilities (finding, comparing, reading, monitoring, abstracts, citation graphs, original LaTeX, section-level technical details, literature reviews), giving comprehensive coverage of the skill's scope.	5 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly states both 'what' (the enumerated capabilities) and 'when' via the leading 'Use when ...' trigger clause with concrete trigger phrases.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural user-facing terms like 'arXiv papers', 'abstracts', 'citation graphs', 'LaTeX', and 'literature reviews', but lacks synonyms/variants (e.g. 'preprints', 'arxiv.org', '.tex') that a score-5 anchor expects.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Scoped narrowly to arXiv with distinct, domain-specific triggers, making overlap with other skills minimal.	5 / 5
	Total	19 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: blazickjp/arxiv-mcp-server
Path: skills/arxiv-mcp-server/SKILL.md
Commit: 164dfa6

Reviewed: about 21 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.