Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tightly written, fully executable activation workflow with clear sequencing, explicit fallbacks, and validation checkpoints. Its only minor gaps are a few flavor sentences and the absence of bundled reference files that would let progressive disclosure reach its top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and procedural, listing concrete activation steps without explaining concepts Claude already knows, and a Conventions section that defines placeholders tersely. Minor flavor lines ('Fully embody this persona so the user gets the best experience') could be trimmed, keeping it just below score 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable commands with concrete arguments, e.g. 'uv run {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --project-root {project-root} --key agent', and placeholders are precisely defined in the Conventions section so the steps are copy-paste ready. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Activation is an explicitly numbered 8-step sequence with a feedback loop ('If the script fails, resolve the agent block yourself...'), explicit checkpoints ('Stop and wait for input'), and a confirmation gate ('confirm every entry was executed in order before proceeding'). This matches the anchor for clear sequence with explicit validation and error-recovery loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a single well-organized file with clear section headers (Overview, Conventions, On Activation with 8 steps) and one-level path references to project files like customize.toml, with no nested multi-level reference chains. It stops short of score 5 only because there are no clearly signaled bundled reference files to split detail into. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |