Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable forwarding shim with a clear sequenced workflow and clean organization; its only weakness is the absence of an explicit validation/confirmation checkpoint and a literal invocation command for the target skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, giving only operational steps; the only trimmable part is the long quoted migration notice in step 3, which is mildly over-explained but still relevant. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a concrete executable command (resolve_customization.py with flags) and explicit context to pass to bmad-architecture, with only a minor gap: the actual invocation of bmad-architecture is described rather than given as a literal command. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four numbered steps are clearly sequenced (resolve customization, load config, emit notice, invoke target) with an explicit 'do not execute further steps' terminator; no validation checkpoint is present, but the operation is a non-destructive forward so the destructive-cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references (none exist in references/scripts/assets), and is organized into clear sections (DEPRECATED header, On Activation, numbered list), meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |