Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of a lean forwarding instruction: it tells Claude exactly which skill to invoke, with which lens, and how to format the output, with no wasted tokens. For a single-purpose deprecated stub it is appropriately concise, actionable, and self-contained.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Two lean sentences convey the entire directive with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete, executable directive — invoke bmad-review with only the 'adversarial' lens, pass through 'also_consider' areas, and present findings as a Markdown list with explicit format constraints (no severity/priority/ranking, no JSON), which is specific and actionable for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Per the rubric's simple-skill note, a single unambiguous action can score 3; here the single action (invoke bmad-review with the adversarial lens and format the output) is unambiguous and clearly sequenced. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a self-contained forwarding skill under 50 lines that appropriately needs no external references or sections, satisfying the rubric's note that simple skills with no need for references can score 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |