Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean shim: it tells Claude exactly which skill to invoke, with which lens, what to pass through, and how to format the output. It would benefit only marginally from a concrete invocation example and a brief post-invocation verification note.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Two lean sentences ('Merged into bmad-review.' and the forwarding instruction) with no padding and no over-explanation, matching the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific instructions specify the lens ('only the adversarial lens'), the passthrough ('also_consider areas'), and the output format ('Markdown list — descriptions only, no severity... no JSON block'); it stops short of anchor 5 only because no literal invocation command or example output is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single forward-and-format action is unambiguous and well-sequenced; the simple-skill exception could justify a 5, but the absence of any verification that the forwarded skill actually ran keeps it at anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a sub-50-line shim with no need for external references, the self-contained single paragraph is well-organized; it does not reach anchor 5 only because there are no section headers to signal structure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |