Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured consulting skill with a clear bifurcated workflow, concrete interview questions, field-level artifact specifications, explicit error handling, and a genuine validation step before delivery. The main weaknesses are redundant restatements of its purpose, an inline provenance section that adds tokens without guiding action, and the absence of a fix-and-re-verify loop after the verification step.
Suggestions
Collapse the 'When to Use' and '## Description' sections into a single purpose statement — the workflow itself already communicates when each scenario applies, so the triple restatement costs tokens without adding guidance.
Move or trim the 'Proveniencia' section (e.g., keep only the source URL and one-line caveat) — its licensing discussion does not guide execution and the key non-misrepresentation point can be one sentence.
Add a fix-and-re-verify loop to the 'Verificar Entrega' step, e.g., 'Si una skill citada no existe o una fase carece de comprobación, corregir el artefacto y repetir la verificación antes de entregar.'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient — it teaches no basic concepts and stays instruction-focused — but the skill's purpose is restated three times (the 'When to Use' section, the '## Description' section, and implicitly in the workflow), and the 'Proveniencia' section is meta-commentary that does not guide execution. This matches anchor 3 ('mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation') rather than anchor 2, since the padding is limited rather than pervasive. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout: literal interview questions (QUÉ / PARA QUIÉN / QUÉ RESULTADO), field-level artifact specs for 'tareas.md' and 'plan_implementacion.md', and explicit error handling ('Si falta una competencia, declaro el hueco en vez de inventar un ID'). It falls short of anchor 5 because there are no copy-paste-ready artifact templates and the worked example is brief; it exceeds anchor 3 because the guidance is executable as written, not pseudocode. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced bifurcated workflow (environment scan → scenario A/B → interview → map skills → generate artifacts → 'Verificar Entrega') with an explicit validation checkpoint that lists concrete confirmations (skills cited exist, phases have concrete checks, verified observations separated from hypotheses). It does not reach anchor 5 because there is no fix-and-re-verify feedback loop after the verification step — the closest anchor is 4 ('clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The 75-line body is well organized into clearly headed sections (instructions, scenario workflow, generation, verification, example, limitations) with no external references needed for a consulting skill of this size. Minor gaps — the duplicated purpose statements and the provenance block inline rather than in frontmatter or a separate file — keep it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |