Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, well-organized, and actionable, naming exact MCP tools, explicit validation steps, and sensible guardrails against masking real defects. The only gaps are minor: no tool-call parameters or example YAML edits, and no explicit re-validation loop when validation fails. Strong overall.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is ~60 lines of purely operational content: a one-sentence Overview ("Repair a failed Agent QA run from recorded evidence and the relevant local source"), tight bullet lists, and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Every section (When to Use, Preconditions, Workflow, Fix Rules, Example, Limitations) earns its tokens, matching anchor 5; even the Example is not padding since it demonstrates the approval boundary. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, named commands are provided throughout: `agent_qa_get_run`, `agent_qa_classify_failure`, `agent_qa_validate_test`, and the fallback "use dashboard REST APIs or local `.agent-qa` artifacts". However, no tool-call parameters or example YAML edits are shown, leaving minor gaps that fit anchor 4 rather than anchor 5's fully copy-paste-ready coverage of common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step Workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints ("Validate any changed Agent QA definition before execution", "Prefer agent_qa_validate_test... before rerunning edited YAML") and an escalation rule ("Stop and report the blocker when evidence cannot distinguish between materially different fixes"). It falls short of anchor 5 only because there is no explicit validate-fail-fix-retry feedback loop; validation is present, so the destructive/batch cap at 3 does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a compact, self-contained skill (~60 lines, no bundle files in references/, scripts/, or assets/) organized into clean sections — Overview, When to Use, Preconditions, Workflow, Fix Rules, Example, Limitations — with all content appropriately living in SKILL.md and no buried or nested references. This matches the rubric's guidance that a short skill with no need for external references scores 5 on well-organized sections alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |