Modern Angular UI patterns for loading states, error handling, and data display. Use when building UI components, handling async data, or managing component states.
82
Quality
79%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
85%
2.65xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/antigravity-angular-ui-patterns/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
67%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description has good structure with an explicit 'Use when' clause that clearly communicates both purpose and triggers. However, it lacks specific concrete actions and could benefit from more distinctive Angular-specific terminology to reduce potential conflicts with other frontend framework skills.
Suggestions
Add more specific concrete actions like 'create skeleton loaders', 'implement error boundaries', 'build reactive data tables with pagination'
Include Angular-specific trigger terms users would naturally say: 'Angular component', 'RxJS', 'Observable', 'NgIf', 'async pipe'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Angular UI) and mentions some actions (loading states, error handling, data display), but lacks concrete specific actions like 'create skeleton loaders', 'implement retry logic', or 'build data tables'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (Angular UI patterns for loading states, error handling, data display) and when (building UI components, handling async data, managing component states) with an explicit 'Use when' clause. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some relevant terms like 'UI components', 'async data', 'component states', but misses common variations users might say like 'spinner', 'loading indicator', 'error message', 'Angular component', or 'RxJS'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The 'Angular' qualifier helps distinguish from generic UI skills, but 'UI components' and 'async data' are broad enough to potentially overlap with React, Vue, or general frontend skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a high-quality skill with excellent actionability and workflow clarity. The code examples are executable and well-structured with clear CORRECT/WRONG comparisons. The decision tree and checklist provide strong validation guidance. The main weakness is that the content is somewhat monolithic - some sections could be extracted to separate reference files for better progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Consider extracting the Form Patterns and Dialog/Modal Patterns sections into separate reference files (e.g., FORMS.md, DIALOGS.md) to reduce the main skill file length
Add a Quick Start section at the top with the most essential pattern (loading state golden rule) before diving into all patterns
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, providing executable code examples without explaining basic Angular concepts Claude already knows. Every section delivers actionable patterns without unnecessary preamble. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable TypeScript/Angular code throughout, with copy-paste ready component examples, clear CORRECT/WRONG comparisons, and specific patterns for loading states, error handling, forms, and dialogs. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Includes a clear Loading State Decision Tree, explicit anti-patterns section showing what NOT to do, and a comprehensive UI State Checklist with validation checkpoints before completing components. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized with clear sections and tables, but the file is quite long (~400 lines) with all content inline. Some patterns (like the Dialog service) could be split into separate reference files. The 'Integration with Other Skills' section provides good cross-references. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
skill_md_line_count | SKILL.md is long (513 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
5c5ae21
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.