CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

antigravity-workflows

Orchestrate multiple Antigravity skills through guided workflows for SaaS MVP delivery, security audits, AI agent builds, and browser QA.

67

1.68x

Quality

52%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

91%

1.68x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/antigravity-antigravity-workflows/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

32%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a clear orchestration role across multiple domains but suffers from missing explicit trigger guidance and relies on internal terminology ('Antigravity skills') that users wouldn't naturally use. The lack of a 'Use when...' clause significantly limits Claude's ability to know when to select this skill over others.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with natural trigger phrases like 'build a SaaS app', 'run a security audit', 'create an AI agent', or 'test in browser'

Replace or explain 'Antigravity skills' with user-facing language, or list the specific skills being orchestrated

Expand with concrete actions for each workflow type (e.g., 'generates project scaffolding, runs security scans, deploys test environments')

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (Antigravity skills, SaaS MVP delivery, security audits, AI agent builds, browser QA) and the general action (orchestrate through guided workflows), but doesn't list specific concrete actions within each area.

2 / 3

Completeness

Describes what it does (orchestrate workflows for various tasks) but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes some relevant terms like 'SaaS MVP', 'security audits', 'AI agent builds', 'browser QA', but 'Antigravity skills' is internal jargon and missing common user phrases like 'build an app', 'test my site', 'security check'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The combination of 'Antigravity skills' and specific workflow types provides some distinctiveness, but terms like 'security audits' and 'browser QA' could overlap with standalone security or testing skills.

2 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Implementation

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill content is well-organized and concise, with good progressive disclosure pointing to external workflow definitions. However, it could be more actionable by showing concrete examples of skill invocation syntax and would benefit from explicit error handling/validation checkpoints in the workflow execution process.

Suggestions

Add a concrete example showing the actual syntax for invoking a skill during workflow execution (e.g., what does 'Invoke recommended skills for that step' look like in practice?)

Include explicit error recovery guidance: what should happen if a workflow step fails or completion criteria aren't met?

Consider adding a brief example of what 'Verify completion criteria' looks like for at least one workflow step

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is lean and efficient, with no unnecessary explanations of concepts Claude would already know. Every section serves a clear purpose and the bullet points are tight.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides a clear 5-step process and routing table, but lacks executable code examples. The copy-paste prompts are helpful but the actual workflow execution steps are somewhat abstract (e.g., 'Invoke recommended skills' without showing how).

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 5-step process is clearly sequenced with verification ('Verify completion criteria before moving to next step'), but lacks explicit validation checkpoints or error recovery guidance. What happens if a step fails is not addressed.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Excellent structure with clear references to external files (docs/WORKFLOWS.md, data/workflows.json) that are one level deep. Content is appropriately split between overview here and detailed playbooks elsewhere.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
boisenoise/skills-collections
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.