Transform audio recordings into professional Markdown documentation with intelligent summaries using LLM integration
50
Quality
30%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
85%
2.17xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/antigravity-audio-transcriber/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
32%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description identifies a clear domain (audio-to-documentation) but suffers from missing explicit trigger guidance and lacks comprehensive action verbs. The phrase 'intelligent summaries using LLM integration' is vague marketing language rather than concrete capability description. Without a 'Use when...' clause, Claude may fail to select this skill appropriately.
Suggestions
Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause with trigger terms like 'transcribe', 'audio file', 'meeting recording', 'voice memo', or file extensions like '.mp3', '.wav'
Replace vague phrases like 'intelligent summaries using LLM integration' with concrete actions such as 'transcribe speech, extract action items, generate meeting notes'
Include common user language variations: 'transcription', 'speech-to-text', 'meeting notes', 'podcast notes'
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (audio recordings, Markdown documentation) and mentions some actions (transform, summaries), but lacks comprehensive concrete actions like 'transcribe', 'format timestamps', 'extract key points', or specific output formats. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Describes what it does (transform audio to documentation) but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some relevant terms ('audio recordings', 'Markdown documentation', 'summaries') but misses common user variations like 'transcribe', 'meeting notes', 'voice memo', 'mp3', 'wav', or 'speech-to-text'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The audio-to-documentation niche is somewhat specific, but 'professional Markdown documentation' and 'intelligent summaries' could overlap with general documentation or summarization skills without the explicit audio trigger. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
27%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill suffers from severe verbosity, including over 400 lines of content that could be condensed to under 100 lines. While it attempts to be comprehensive, it explains too many basic concepts, includes incomplete placeholder code, and lacks proper progressive disclosure. The workflow has missing steps (2 and 4) and inconsistent structure that would confuse implementation.
Suggestions
Reduce content by 70%+ by removing explanations of basic concepts (file existence checks, format lists) and condensing examples to 1-2 representative cases
Complete the placeholder functions (cluster_by_topic, extract_action_items, call_ai_model) or remove them and provide actual executable implementations
Fix the workflow numbering (Steps 0, 1, 3, 5 are present but 2 and 4 are missing) and consolidate the fragmented scenario sections
Split detailed content into separate reference files (e.g., EXAMPLES.md, INSTALLATION.md, OUTPUT-TEMPLATES.md) and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with clear links
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely verbose with extensive bash scripts, redundant explanations, and multiple lengthy examples. The content explains basic concepts Claude already knows (what formats are supported, how to check if files exist) and includes excessive boilerplate that could be dramatically condensed. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | Contains executable code snippets and bash commands, but many are incomplete or pseudocode-like (e.g., `call_ai_model(summary_prompt)` is a placeholder). The Python functions like `cluster_by_topic()` and `extract_action_items()` are referenced but never defined. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are numbered and sequenced (Step 0, 1, 3, 5 - notably missing Step 2 and 4), but validation checkpoints are inconsistent. The workflow jumps between scenarios without clear decision trees, and error recovery paths are incomplete. Missing steps create confusion. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Monolithic wall of text with no references to external files for detailed content. Everything is inline including lengthy code blocks, multiple examples, and scenario descriptions that could be split into separate reference documents. No clear navigation structure. | 1 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Validation
81%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 9 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
skill_md_line_count | SKILL.md is long (556 lines); consider splitting into references/ and linking | Warning |
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 9 / 11 Passed | |
5c5ae21
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.