Guidelines for modern Avalonia UI layout using Zafiro.Avalonia, emphasizing shared styles, generic components, and avoiding XAML redundancy.
66
Quality
52%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
86%
1.22xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/antigravity-avalonia-layout-zafiro/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
32%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description identifies a specific technology stack (Avalonia with Zafiro.Avalonia) and mentions key concepts, but reads more like a topic summary than actionable skill guidance. It lacks explicit trigger conditions and concrete actions, making it difficult for Claude to know precisely when to select this skill over other UI-related skills.
Suggestions
Add a 'Use when...' clause with explicit triggers like 'Use when building Avalonia desktop applications, working with .axaml files, or when the user mentions Zafiro, Avalonia styling, or cross-platform .NET UI'.
Replace 'Guidelines for' with concrete actions like 'Creates Avalonia UI layouts, defines reusable styles, builds generic components using Zafiro.Avalonia patterns'.
Include common user terms and file extensions like '.axaml', 'desktop app UI', 'cross-platform .NET', or 'MVVM layout' to improve trigger matching.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Avalonia UI layout) and mentions some concepts (shared styles, generic components, avoiding XAML redundancy), but doesn't list concrete actions like 'create layouts', 'define styles', or 'build components'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Describes what the skill covers (guidelines for Avalonia UI layout) but completely lacks a 'Use when...' clause or any explicit trigger guidance for when Claude should select this skill. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes relevant technical terms like 'Avalonia', 'Zafiro.Avalonia', 'XAML', and 'UI layout', but missing common variations users might say like '.axaml', 'desktop app', 'cross-platform UI', or 'WPF-like'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The mention of 'Zafiro.Avalonia' specifically adds some distinctiveness, but 'UI layout' and 'shared styles' are generic enough to potentially overlap with other UI framework skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill excels at organization and progressive disclosure with its clear content map and selective reading guidance. However, it functions more as a reference checklist than an actionable guide, lacking concrete XAML code examples that would make it immediately executable. The anti-patterns section is valuable but would benefit from before/after code snippets.
Suggestions
Add concrete XAML code examples showing proper usage of `HeaderedContainer`, `EdgePanel`, and `IconExtension` syntax
Include a before/after code comparison for at least one anti-pattern to make the guidance more actionable
Add a brief 'Quick Start' section with a minimal complete example of a clean layout using the recommended patterns
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, using tables, checklists, and bullet points without explaining concepts Claude already knows. Every section serves a clear purpose with no padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides good guidance through checklists and anti-patterns, but lacks concrete executable code examples. References like `{Icon fa-name}` hint at syntax but don't show complete, copy-paste ready XAML snippets. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The checklist provides a sequence of considerations, but there's no explicit step-by-step workflow for creating layouts. It's more of a reference guide than a procedural workflow with validation checkpoints. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Excellent structure with a clear content map table showing exactly when to read each referenced file. References are one level deep and well-signaled with descriptions and use cases. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
5c5ae21
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.