Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is reasonably organized with a content map, checklist, and anti-patterns, but it lacks executable examples, validation checkpoints, and the referenced bundle files are missing, limiting actionability and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Provide at least one complete, copy-paste axaml snippet (e.g., a HeaderedContainer or EdgePanel usage) to raise actionability.
Create the referenced bundle files (themes.md, containers.md, icons.md, behaviors.md, components.md) so the content map resolves to real one-level-deep references.
Replace the generic 'When to Use' boilerplate with concrete validation guidance (e.g., how to verify a layout renders cleanly or styles resolve).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient (checklist, anti-patterns, content map), but the generic 'When to Use' boilerplate ('This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview') adds padding without value. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is present (specific controls like HeaderedContainer, EdgePanel, {Icon fa-name}) but there are no executable axaml code examples to copy, leaving the guidance instructive rather than fully actionable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The checklist and DO/DON'T lists give a usable sequence of concerns, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops for layout changes. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A content map points to referenced files (themes.md, containers.md, etc.), but those bundle files do not exist in references/, so the navigation cannot be verified and the structure is only partially realized. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |