CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

aws-skills

AWS development with infrastructure automation and cloud architecture patterns

40

Quality

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

30%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-organized and lean in structure but carries almost no actionable content, repeating the description instead of providing concrete guidance or a workflow. Its main value is progressive disclosure of clearly labeled sections; its weakness is the near-total absence of executable or specific instructions.

Suggestions

Replace the repeated description in Instructions with concrete guidance: specific AWS actions, example IaC snippets, or named services/tools to use.

Add a brief workflow or sequenced steps (e.g., gather requirements -> choose service -> provision via IaC -> validate) with a validation checkpoint.

Remove the verbatim repetition of the description across Overview/When to Use/Instructions so every section adds distinct information.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is short and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the same description phrase is repeated verbatim across Overview, When to Use, and Instructions, so some tokens do not earn their place and could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

The Instructions section only says 'provides guidance and patterns for...' which is purely abstract; there is no concrete code, command, or example, so it describes rather than instructs.

1 / 3

Workflow Clarity

No multi-step process, sequence, or validation checkpoint is described at all; the body offers only generic placeholder statements with no actionable workflow.

1 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files, and the content is organized into clear labeled sections (Overview, When to Use, Instructions, Limitations) with a single one-level external reference, satisfying the simple-skill guidance.

3 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Description

50%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description names a recognizable domain but relies on abstract phrasing and lacks an explicit trigger clause, leaving it competent but generic. It would benefit from concrete action verbs and a 'Use when...' clause with natural user terms.

Suggestions

Add concrete action verbs (e.g., 'Provision and deploy AWS infrastructure, automate with IaC, design cloud architecture patterns').

Append an explicit trigger clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks to provision AWS resources, write Terraform/CloudFormation, or design cloud architecture.'

Include natural user-facing keywords like 'deploy', 'provision', 'Terraform', 'CloudFormation', or 'IaC' to improve trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('AWS development with infrastructure automation and cloud architecture patterns') but uses abstract topic nouns rather than concrete action verbs like 'Provision', 'Deploy', or 'Configure', so it is not comprehensive enough for a 3.

2 / 3

Completeness

It states a 'what' (AWS development with infrastructure automation), but there is no explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, which per the rubric caps completeness at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It includes some relevant keywords ('AWS development', 'infrastructure automation') that a user might say, but misses common variations like 'provision resources', 'Terraform', 'CloudFormation', or 'IaC'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'AWS development' is somewhat specific to the AWS niche but is broad enough to overlap with many other AWS-related skills, so it is not a clearly distinct niche.

2 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
boisenoise/skills-collections
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.