Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a concrete script-call contract and lean prose, but the generation workflow lacks any validation/verification step and one referenced file (reference.md) does not exist in the bundle.
Suggestions
Add a validation step to the workflow (e.g., after generation, open/inspect the .pptx or run a quick check that slide count is 8-12 and bullets are non-empty) to lift workflow_clarity past the batch-operation cap of 3.
Create the missing references/reference.md (or remove the reference to it) so that all in-body file references resolve to real bundle files.
Tighten slightly verbose phrasing like '一份合格的演示文稿总页数应为 8-12 页' to '总页数 8-12 页' to push conciseness toward 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — a short step list, a JSON schema, and constraints — and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but a few phrases ('一份合格的演示文稿总页数应为 8-12 页') are mildly padded, keeping it just below the 'every token earns its place' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete, copy-paste-ready tool invocation run_skill_script(...) with a complete JSON payload schema and explicit numeric constraints (≥8 slides, 3-5 bullets), fully covering the common generation case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step sequence (通读→规划页序→提炼要点→生成文件) is clear, but this batch generation workflow has no validation checkpoint (e.g., verify the produced .pptx opens / bullets fit), so per the batch-operation cap it cannot exceed 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured overview that defers detail to clearly signaled one-level-deep references (reference.md, scripts/generate_pptx.py); the script exists, but the referenced reference.md has no corresponding references/ directory, a minor organization gap above the 'buried/inline' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |