Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably concise and gives concrete, actionable instructions with a clear handoff model, but the workflow lacks explicit validation checkpoints before recording findings or handing off. Adding one or two verify-then-proceed steps would raise workflow clarity without sacrificing brevity.
Suggestions
Insert an explicit validation checkpoint, e.g. '记录前确认数值/单位/URL 来自检索结果而非记忆' (before recording, confirm the value/unit/URL came from results, not memory), turning the existing guardrail into a verify step.
Add a one-line worked example of a `web_search` query and the verbatim record format to lift actionability from 4 to 5.
Make the handoff condition explicit and ordered (e.g. 'if computation is needed → data_analysis; else if code execution → coding; else → writing') so the decision branch is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~6-line body is lean and efficient: it assumes Claude's competence, assigns a role and concrete tool without explaining what web_search or a URL is, and every line earns its place, matching 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, specific guidance — name the tool (`web_search`), prefer primary/authoritative sources, record numbers/units/time-ranges/URLs verbatim, and explicit handoff targets (`data_analysis`/`coding`/`writing`) — but provides no worked example queries, fitting 'mostly executable guidance; minor gaps' rather than the fully copy-paste level 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A sequence is present (search → record verbatim → decide handoff) but there are no explicit validation checkpoints (e.g. confirm a source is authoritative before recording, or verify a number was actually found), matching 'steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints missing or implicit'. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references; its self-contained, well-organized content qualifies for the simple-skills exception that lets progressive disclosure score 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |