Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-organized instruction-only skill with concrete directives, examples, and a clear validation-backed workflow for the Peer Quality Check. The only weakness is minor unnecessary historical context in the opening paragraph.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The rules are stated efficiently with concrete examples, but the Context paragraph's history ("previously duplicated in every charter... now they live here as a shared skill, loaded once") is unnecessary rationale that could be trimmed. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Directives are concrete and specific for an instruction-only skill, with executable examples such as fake fixtures "test-agent-1"/"TestBot", named agents Flight/EECOM/FIDO, and a concrete file reference history.md. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Peer Quality Check is a clearly ordered sequence with an explicit validation step ("Run the test suite for files you touched") and feedback loops (check CI contribution; update history.md on mistakes). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and no bundle files, the body is well-organized into Context, Patterns (with sub-sections), and Anti-Patterns sections, satisfying the simple-skill allowance. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |