Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a compact, well-structured instruction skill: two hard rules stated with concrete examples of what to avoid and what to do instead, plus an anti-patterns recap. Its main gaps are minor — slight redundancy between Patterns and Anti-Patterns and a couple of vague verification steps.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with concrete examples and no padding of concepts Claude already knows; only the provenance sentence ('They were previously duplicated in every charter. Now they live here...') and the Anti-Patterns section, which partially restates the rules negatively, could be trimmed. Not 5 because those few tokens do not earn their place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance for an instruction-only skill: bans hardcoded names with specific locations ('test assertions, CI configs, or product logic') and fixture examples ('test-agent-1', 'TestBot'), and directs running the test suite for files touched. Not 5 because 'check your changes aren't contributing to the problem' and 'update your history.md' lack concrete commands or steps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines, its two rules are unambiguous and the Peer Quality Check has a clear sequence with validation (run the suite for touched files, check pre-existing CI failures) plus a feedback element ('update your history.md'). Not 5 because there is no explicit recovery loop for what to do when the verification fails. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no external references needed, and the body is well organized into clearly labeled Context, Patterns, and Anti-Patterns sections. Per the rubric's simple-skill note, this scores 5 with just well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |