Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, well-structured, and actionable, with a clear checklist that includes an explicit verification step keyed to the recurring bug. The only minor gap is that code examples use template placeholders rather than fully concrete copy-paste snippets.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: a tight checklist, a compact wiring-pattern table, a single import snippet, and a brief history note, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, mostly-executable code templates for the routing block, help text, and import pattern, plus a table mapping command types to wiring approaches; the use of placeholders like <name> and run<Name> keeps it just short of copy-paste-ready, fitting 'mostly executable guidance with minor gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step checklist with an explicit validation checkpoint ('Verify both exist — the recurring bug is doing step 1 but missing steps 2-3'); as a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines, it qualifies for the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections (checklist, patterns table, import pattern, history) and no need for external references, satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |