Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with executable commands, complete JSON examples, and a clearly sequenced handoff workflow with validation and feedback loops. Its weakness is repetition: the squad-vs-task-agent disambiguation is restated across multiple sections and could be consolidated to improve token efficiency.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated 'squad vs ad-hoc task agents' disambiguation into one authoritative section; the Context block, Disambiguation intro, and Anti-patterns restate the same point and can be tightened.
Move the full manifest schema and squad.config.ts example into a separate reference file (e.g., references/manifest.md) to keep SKILL.md an overview and lift progressive disclosure to a clear 5.
Trim the duplicated Anti-Patterns section at the end, which overlaps heavily with the in-section Anti-patterns under Disambiguation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and action-oriented, but several passages restate the same disambiguation point multiple times (the Context block, the Disambiguation section, and the Anti-patterns all repeat 'don't treat task agents as squads'), which is padding that could be tightened. It does not over-explain concepts Claude already knows, keeping it above 2. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands and concrete examples throughout — `squad registry add`, `squad discover`, `squad delegate`, `gh issue create` with exact title/label/body fields, plus complete manifest JSON and config snippets — covering the common cases with executable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Work Handoff Protocol is a clearly sequenced 4-step process (Check manifest → Create issue → Track → Poll) with an explicit validation checkpoint ('Verify the target squad accepts the work type') and a feedback loop (Poll via `gh issue view`, update originating issue, close when merged), matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into Context, Disambiguation, Patterns, Examples, and Anti-Patterns, with a clearly signaled one-level reference to the companion `cross-squad-communication` skill. It stays below 5 because no bundle files exist and some reference-style detail (e.g., full manifest schema) is inlined rather than split into a separate file, leaving minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |