Content
80%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, executable, and well-sequenced, providing copy-paste-ready git/gh commands for the Squad model. Its main gaps are missing validation checkpoints around destructive operations and no progressive disclosure to split the longer worktree/multi-repo sections into reference files.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation/verification checkpoints before destructive steps (e.g., confirm the build is green and the PR is merged before deleting a branch or removing a worktree).
Split the worktree and multi-repo sections into one-level-deep reference files (e.g., WORKTREES.md, MULTI-REPO.md) referenced from the main body to improve progressive disclosure.
Add a brief verification step in the issue workflow (e.g., run tests, confirm gh pr checks passes) before marking the PR ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body assumes Claude knows git/gh and only adds Squad-specific conventions, using compact tables and copy-paste commands with no padding or explanation of basic concepts. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable, specific commands throughout (git checkout -b, gh pr create --base dev, git worktree add, npm link) with clearly templated placeholders, making the guidance copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced (numbered issue workflow, worktree setup, cleanup), but destructive/batch operations (branch deletion, git push --delete, worktree remove) lack explicit validation checkpoints, capping this at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with clear headers, but the skill exceeds 50 lines and keeps worktree and multi-repo material entirely inline with no one-level-deep references to separate files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |