Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, actionable tone guide with concrete templates and examples. Its main weakness is redundancy across the patterns, examples, and anti-patterns sections, and it could tighten token usage and split the example templates into a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but the patterns, examples, and anti-patterns sections repeat overlapping ideas (e.g. link-dumping and passive voice each appear multiple times), so it is mostly efficient but could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready templates with placeholders ({author}, {explanation}) and specific phrase examples like 'Thanks for reporting this' and 'We're looking into this' provide mostly executable guidance with only minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-purpose tone skill the action is unambiguous and well-sequenced through patterns then examples; it is not a destructive/batch operation so the validation cap does not apply, though there are no explicit checkpoints, keeping it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized into Context, Patterns, Examples, and Anti-Patterns sections with no bundle files to reference; at ~90 lines it slightly exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill threshold and could offload the example templates to a separate file, so it is mostly well-placed. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |