Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, well-validated workflow and concrete commands, but it is a single monolithic file with some repetition across sections. Splitting the long Examples/Anti-Patterns into referenced files and de-duplicating the reply templates would improve both conciseness and progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Move the extended Examples and Anti-Patterns sections into a referenced file (e.g. EXAMPLES.md) linked one level deep to improve progressive disclosure.
De-duplicate the reply-body and commit-message templates that recur across Steps, Examples, and Anti-Patterns.
Tighten the 'When to resolve vs. leave open' rules, which are stated in both Step 4 and Anti-Patterns.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and free of basics Claude already knows, but the reply templates, resolve-rules, and commit-message formats recur across Steps, Examples, and Anti-Patterns, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready gh api .../replies commands, GraphQL resolve mutations, and concrete reply-body templates make the guidance fully executable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Read→Fix→Commit→Reply→Resolve sequence with explicit checkpoints (reply only after pushing, resolve-vs-leave-open rules, STOP guardrails) covers the batch thread-reply operation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well organized but the ~250-line file is monolithic with no bundle references; content such as the extended Examples and Anti-Patterns could be externalized one level deep. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |