Content
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a clearly organized design proposal with a useful decision table and concrete file-path conventions, but it is hampered by duplicated template content, non-executable placeholder scaffolding for an unimplemented runtime, and a lack of validation checkpoints in its multi-step processes.
Suggestions
Collapse the duplicate 'Spawn Template Pattern' and 'Spawn Template' sections into one, or move the full template into a separate reference file referenced once from the overview.
Add explicit validation/feedback steps to the Scribe promotion and implementation workflows (e.g., verify the Hot file was written, confirm the Cold summary meets the ~10% verbosity target before promotion).
Mark the placeholder spawn template and '--include-cold'/'--include-wiki' flags as proposed/not-yet-executable inline so it is unambiguous that they are design scaffolding rather than runnable commands.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is well-sectioned and assumes Claude's competence (no basic-concept padding), but the spawn template is presented twice (the 'Spawn Template Pattern' code blocks and the full 'Spawn Template' section) and the 'design proposal, not shipped' disclaimer repeats at top and bottom, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete structural guidance (file paths like '.squad/memory/hot/{agent}.md', size targets, a decision table), but the spawn templates use unresolvable placeholders ('{hot_context}') and '--include-cold'/'--include-wiki' flags for a runtime that is explicitly not implemented, which is scaffolding rather than executable code. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Scribe integration steps (1-2-3) and the implementation checklist are sequenced, and the 'When to Load Each Tier' table is clear, but the multi-step processes lack any validation checkpoints or feedback loops, matching 'steps listed but validation gaps'. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | There are no bundle files and the headers are well-organized with no nested references, but the ~95-line inline 'Spawn Template' section duplicates earlier content and could be split into a separate reference file, fitting 'content that should be separate is inline'. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |