Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with real verified scripts, clear command templates, explicit error handling, and appropriate one-level-deep references. Sits just below top marks because of minor over-explanation, parameterized (non-literal) templates, and one-shot rather than fully iterative validation loops.
Suggestions
Trim justifying prose (the copy-paste analogy and the 'Below are all atomic capabilities...' paragraph) to lift conciseness toward the lean anchor.
Add one fully-resolved worked example (a concrete user_id with the actual command and a sample output) to push actionability to copy-paste-ready.
Turn the per-command 'if error: true' notes into an explicit validate -> fix -> re-run loop so the batch workflow has a clear feedback cycle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean with sectioned command templates and output examples, but contains some justifying prose (e.g., "Its role is equivalent to copy-pasting on the user's behalf... automation merely saves time" and the "Below are all atomic capabilities..." intro) that could be trimmed, fitting 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable command templates ("navigate", "wait stable", "eval \"$(python scripts/extract-user-profile.py {user_id})\"") with real script paths, documented parameters, and JSON output examples, but parameterized placeholders ({user_id}, {limit}) and the absence of a single fully-resolved worked example leave a minor gap below the copy-paste-ready top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequences with checkpoints (login verification, "wait stable", success criteria, per-command "if error: true" recovery guidance, "Test before batch execution") for a batch-capable skill, but recovery guidance is somewhat one-shot rather than an explicit validate-fix-revalidate loop, fitting 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with one-level-deep references to real scripts/ files ("JS code is encapsulated in Python files under the scripts/ directory... Only inspect scripts when execution fails") that are clearly signaled, fitting 'good structure; most content appropriately placed; references mostly clear; minor organization gaps' rather than the multi-reference-file top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |