Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content delivers a clearly sequenced, validated research workflow with genuinely actionable query patterns and temporal guidance. Its main weaknesses are redundancy across the four sections that restate the sufficiency criteria and the absence of any progressive-disclosure offloading in a fairly long single file.
Suggestions
Merge "Quality Bar", "Common Mistakes to Avoid", and "Output" into the Phase 4 synthesis checklist — they restate the same sufficiency criteria three times and could be cut to one section.
Move the temporal-precision table and query-pattern catalogs into a reference file (e.g. references/query-patterns.md) and keep SKILL.md as a lean overview of the four phases, bringing the body closer to a progressive-disclosure ideal.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient methodology guidance, but the same completeness criteria are restated across "Phase 4: Synthesis Check", "Quality Bar", "Common Mistakes to Avoid", and "Output", and emphasis lines like "A single search query is NEVER enough" and "Never generate content based solely on general knowledge" repeat the core principle already stated. This matches anchor 3 ("mostly efficient but could be tightened"), not 4, since whole sections could be merged. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, immediately usable guidance throughout: example search sets for "AI in healthcare", ❌/✅ query patterns, a table of information types with example searches, and a temporal-precision table mapping user intent to query format. Not 5 because some guidance remains advisory ("Follow References", "Identify gaps") without worked examples, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-phase sequence (Broad Exploration → Deep Dive → Diversity & Validation → Synthesis Check) culminating in an explicit validation checklist with a feedback loop: "If any answer is NO, continue researching before generating content." The "Iterative Refinement" section adds the review → gap-identify → retry loop, matching anchor 5 exactly. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file structure with clear section headers, a navigable flow, and no nested references (no bundle files exist). Not 5 because at ~190 lines all content is inline — the temporal-awareness table and query-pattern catalogs are natural candidates for a reference file that would keep SKILL.md a leaner overview. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |