CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

android-emulator

Verify and debug native, React Native, Expo, or Flutter apps on an Android Emulator with agent-device. Use when an agent needs to launch an app, inspect its live UI, tap, type, scroll, validate a code change, collect failure evidence, or reproduce a workflow on an Android virtual device.

75

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exemplary lean skill body: executable commands for all entry points, explicit behavioral policies (don't auto-install, don't probe, stop on missing CLI), a clear error-recovery path, and well-signaled deferred detail via version-matched help topics. The single gap is the absence of a concrete example interaction command after `open`, leaving the actual driving steps delegated to the tool's runtime output.

Suggestions

Include one short example of a follow-up interaction after `agent-device open` (e.g., a tap or assert command from the interactive snapshot) so the common driving loop is copy-paste ready without relying solely on the tool's runtime hints.

Briefly name the concrete evidence commands (screenshot/log capture) in the debugging entry point or as a one-line pointer, since 'collect failure evidence' is a stated capability but has no corresponding command in the body.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The ~30-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: it never explains what an emulator or the CLI is, and every sentence either gives a command or a policy ("Do not probe first with --help...", "Treat installation and upgrades as user-owned setup steps"). This matches the 'every token earns its place' anchor; there is no padding to trim for level 4.

5 / 5

Actionability

Concrete, executable commands are given for every entry point — `npm install -g agent-device@latest`, `agent-device open <app-or-package-id> --platform android --foreground`, and five `agent-device help <topic>` commands. However, no example of an actual follow-up interaction command (tap/type/scroll after opening) is shown — that detail is delegated to the tool's "initial interactive snapshot and corrective error hints" — which is a minor gap fitting the 'mostly executable, concrete commands with minor gaps' anchor rather than the fully-covered level 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

For a simple, single-purpose skill the flow is unambiguous and correctly ordered: require user-owned install → open with explicit platform flag → follow the interactive snapshot and corrective hints → on unavailability, stop and ask the user → consult version-matched help only for specialized tasks. There is an explicit error-recovery path ("If the shell reports that agent-device is unavailable, stop and ask the user") and a corrective feedback loop via the snapshot hints, so it exceeds the level-4 anchor with its minor validation gaps.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent) and the body is under 50 lines, so per the rubric's simple-skill guideline well-organized short content can score 5. The only deferred content is one level deep and clearly signaled with a condition — "Only when the task is specialized or a command shape is unclear, read the relevant version-matched help topic" — with each topic annotated (e.g., "engineering validation and build freshness").

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: concrete capability enumeration, explicit third-person voice, a clear 'Use when...' trigger clause, and a well-scoped niche. The only weakness is slightly incomplete natural-term coverage (missing casual phrasings like 'test my app on the emulator' or file extensions like .apk).

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description enumerates multiple concrete actions — "launch an app, inspect its live UI, tap, type, scroll, validate a code change, collect failure evidence, or reproduce a workflow" — giving comprehensive coverage of the app-driving domain. It matches the anchor for multiple specific concrete actions with comprehensive coverage, not the level-4 anchor that requires minor gaps in coverage.

5 / 5

Completeness

Both parts are explicit: the 'what' is "Verify and debug native, React Native, Expo, or Flutter apps on an Android Emulator with agent-device" and the 'when' is an explicit "Use when an agent needs to..." clause with concrete trigger phrases. This clearly matches the level-5 anchor answering both what and when with concrete triggers, and exceeds level 4 where the 'when' is only generally stated.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural keyword coverage: "launch an app", "tap, type, scroll", "validate a code change", "Android Emulator", "React Native", "Expo", "Flutter", "reproduce a workflow" are phrases users would naturally say. A few common variants are missing (e.g., "test my app", "run the app", "AVD", ".apk"), so it fits the 'good coverage with a few natural terms missing' anchor rather than the comprehensive synonym/extension coverage of level 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It occupies a clear niche — device driving on an Android virtual device via the specific `agent-device` tool, explicitly scoping platform ("Android Emulator", "--platform android" implied domain) and frameworks (native, React Native, Expo, Flutter). Triggers are distinct and unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the minimal-conflict anchor; it is clearly more distinct than the level-4 'minor overlap with closely related skills' example.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

callstack/agent-device

Path

skills/android-emulator/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.