Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, high-signal reference that assumes Claude's competence and documents only project-specific conventions with concrete paths and commands. It falls slightly short of top marks on actionability and workflow clarity for lacking code examples and an explicit fix-and-revalidate loop.
Suggestions
Add one minimal copy-paste example of a thin route file (loader + pendingComponent wiring into a pod page component) and one queryOptions constant, since these are the core building blocks the skill describes.
Make the commit-checks section an explicit feedback loop: state that lint/typecheck/test failures must be fixed and the checks re-run before committing.
Trim the data-loading tier and pre-feature consideration sections to their decision rules and defer the full patterns to the already-referenced docs/monorepo-docs/frontend/data-loading.md and before-starting.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section carries project-specific, non-obvious knowledge (path aliases, pod autonomy, export-block rules, pagination defaults, permission handling) with zero explanation of React, TypeScript, or Carbon basics — every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Exact commands ("npm run prettier:format", "npm run typecheck"), exact paths ("#/shared/http/queries.ts", "src/routes/_auth/{pod}/"), and crisp decision rules make the guidance mostly executable, but there are no code examples for the core steps (a thin route file, a queryOptions constant), leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | "Building a feature" gives a clear three-step sequence, "Before starting a feature" provides pre-work checkpoints, and "Local checks before commit" supplies explicit validation commands — but no fix-and-re-run feedback loop or checklist, so it fits anchor 4 rather than the explicit-error-recovery anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The ~100-line body is well-sectioned and delegates detail to the one-level-deep "Canonical docs" list with per-doc descriptions, but sections like the data-loading tiers and pre-feature considerations carry detail inline that could live in those referenced docs. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |