Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, well-structured reference of project-specific conventions with strong actionability and clean progressive disclosure to canonical docs. The main gap is the absence of explicit validation/feedback-loop checkpoints in the commit-checks workflow.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop to 'Local checks before commit' — e.g., 'If lint/typecheck/test fail, fix the reported issues and re-run until all pass before committing.'
Make the 'Building a feature' sequence a true checklist with a verification step confirming the route loads and types check before moving on.
Consider one small inline code snippet for the central pattern (a thin route file or a queryOptions constant) so the core workflow is copy-paste ready without leaving SKILL.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Terse bullet conventions with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows (React, Vite, etc.); nearly every line is project-specific guidance that earns its place, fitting the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides exact paths, function names (useSuspenseInfiniteQuery, hasMoreTotalItems), decision rules, and copy-paste-ready npm commands; as an instruction-style skill the guidance is concrete and actionable even without inline code. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | 'Building a feature' is sequenced and 'Local checks before commit' lists commands, but there is no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop or 'only commit when all pass' checkpoint, so it sits at the score-2 anchor with implicit checkpoints. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-organized overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep references in the 'Canonical docs' section, matching the 'clear overview with well-signaled references' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |