Content
30%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a placeholder: a title plus one vacuous sentence that adds nothing beyond the frontmatter. While it commits no conciseness or structure sins, it provides zero actionable guidance and no workflow, making the skill unusable as written.
Suggestions
State the skill's purpose and at least one concrete action (what to do and how) in the body — e.g., specific commands, code, or step-by-step guidance for the calendar task.
If the skill has any multi-step or risky operations, add an explicit numbered workflow with validation checkpoints before proceeding.
Replace 'This is the third calendar skill.' with content that distinguishes this skill's actual capabilities, or reference supporting files if deeper detail exists elsewhere.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is only a heading and one sentence ('This is the third calendar skill.'), so there is no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. The single sentence merely restates the H1 ('# Calendar (Third)'), a minor redundancy that could be trimmed, matching anchor 4 rather than 5's 'every token earns its place'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | 'This is the third calendar skill.' only describes; there is no concrete code, command, or executable guidance of any kind. This exactly matches anchor 1 ('only describes rather than instructs') and is not level 2, which requires at least high-level hints toward specific steps. | 1 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | No steps or sequence are present anywhere in the body — it never states what the skill does or how to do it. The simple-skill exception does not apply because there is no unambiguous single action defined, so this stays at anchor 1 ('steps missing or incoherent') rather than 2, which requires a rough sequence. | 1 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body has a single heading and no wall of text, no buried or nested references, and no inline content that belongs in separate files. However, it cannot be called a clear, well-organized overview — it signals nothing and points nowhere — so it sits at anchor 3 rather than 4-5, which require demonstrated good structure. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 9 / 20 Passed |