Content
33%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a stub: one heading and one declarative sentence with no actionable guidance, workflow, or referenced materials. It is token-efficient only because it contains almost nothing of use.
Suggestions
Add concrete, executable guidance or a minimal code example for the skill's core calendar task.
Include a brief sequenced workflow with any validation needed for calendar operations.
State the skill's distinct purpose so the body is not merely a restatement of the description.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body ("# Calendar (Second)\n\nThis is the second calendar skill.") is extremely lean with no padding or over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, fitting the 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed' anchor rather than a 5 because the tokens convey essentially no useful information. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | "This is the second calendar skill." provides no code, commands, or concrete steps, only a descriptive statement, matching the 'entirely vague or abstract; no concrete guidance' anchor. | 1 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There are no sequenced steps or validation checkpoints whatsoever, only a single declarative sentence, matching the 'steps missing or incoherent' anchor. | 1 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple under-50-line skill with no bundle files, and it has a single organizing heading; per the simple-skills note it can score well for organization, landing at 4 rather than 5 because the structure is minimal rather than clearly well-organized. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 10 / 20 Passed |