Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured orchestration skill with a clear multi-stage workflow, explicit validation checkpoints, and clean progressive disclosure via one real reference file. Slight conciseness gains are available from de-duplicating the checkpoint pattern.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the checkpoint/verification pattern: state it once in Execution Requirements and reference it from each stage rather than restating the format inline.
Trim the persona's restatement of the Diataxis categories—Claude already knows the framework—keeping only how this skill applies it.
Optionally show the exact invocation form for the atomic skills (e.g. the skill name as called) to remove ambiguity about how each stage is executed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient orchestration prose, but minor redundancy—e.g. the checkpoint/verification pattern is stated in "Execution Requirements" and restated in each stage—and the persona lightly re-explains the Diataxis framework Claude already knows. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Names the exact atomic skill to invoke per stage, what to capture, and a concrete checkpoint string format; guidance is executable with only minor gaps (no invocation syntax). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 7-stage workflow with an explicit per-stage verification/checkpoint pattern, a STOP decision point on build failure, and a dedicated error-handling section providing feedback loops. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into Scope/Persona/Workflow/Error Handling/Constraints with a single one-level-deep, clearly signaled reference to references/doc-review-report-template.md (a real bundle file); bulk detail is appropriately delegated to atomic skills. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |